ClawHack NYC — Hacker Guide
Theme: Group Agents
1. What This Hackathon Is About
This edition focuses on one specific design space: agents operating inside group chats.
In previous waves, most agents were either:
-
One user interacting with one assistant, or
-
A personal agent with tool access acting on behalf of one user
Today, we are exploring what changes when:
-
Multiple humans share a group thread
-
Multiple agents exist inside that same thread
-
Each agent is scoped to that conversation only
-
Agents have explicit boundaries around visibility and capability
The goal is to experiment with coordination inside a shared conversational context.
The Stack You’ll Use
You’ll be building with:
-
XMTP → secure messaging and identity layer
-
Convos → group chat interface
-
OpenClaw → agent execution runtime
How they fit together:
| Layer |
Role |
| XMTP |
Secure communication protocol between humans and agents |
| Convos |
UI where the group conversation lives |
| OpenClaw |
Runtime where agents reason, use tools, and execute actions |
Your project should meaningfully explore group coordination using this stack.
This is not about building a large production system.
It is about exploring interaction patterns under constraint.
2. Schedule and Submission Requirements
Timeline
-
Morning: setup, team formation, stack integration
-
Midday: build
-
Afternoon: testing and demo recording
-
6:00 PM: submissions close
What You Must Submit
- A working prototype
- A YouTube demo video that:
-
Shows the group chat in action
-
Demonstrates your agent(s) working
-
Explains what problem you explored
- A short written description including:
The demo should clearly show how agents operate inside a group thread.
3. What You Can Build
Your project must involve group-based coordination.
Possible directions:
A. Coordinating Agent in a Group
-
Scheduling across multiple participants
-
Coordinating shared logistics
-
Managing shared resources
B. Multiple Agents in One Thread
-
Planner agent delegating to executor agent
-
Research agent + summarizer agent collaborating
-
Agents with different permission scopes
C. Human + Agent Collaboration
-
Agent proposes actions, humans approve
-
Agent mediates or structures discussion
-
Agent only responds when explicitly invoked
D. Scoped / Permissioned Agents
-
Agents restricted to specific message types
-
Agents that cannot access external data
-
Agents that escalate to humans when blocked
The key evaluation question:
How does behavior change when agents operate inside a shared, encrypted group conversation rather than a one-on-one chat?
4. Resources and How They Fit Into Your Stack
Below are the available tools and what role they play.
Convos + XMTP
Communication and identity layer.
You can:
You may also connect an existing OpenClaw instance to Convos and use XMTP as the messaging layer.
Use this layer for:
OpenClaw
Agent runtime.
OpenClaw provides:
Use OpenClaw for:
-
Reasoning
-
Acting on tasks
-
Managing tool boundaries
Your OpenClaw agent should connect to the group via XMTP.
Kilo Code
OpenClaw development tooling.
Kilo can help with:
Use Kilo if you want improved development speed around OpenClaw.
Convex
Realtime backend and state layer.
Convex provides:
-
Persistent shared state
-
Realtime updates
-
Structured data storage
Use Convex if:
-
Multiple agents need shared memory
-
You need durable coordination state
-
You want structured backend logic
Zo Computer
Secure compute layer.
Zo provides:
-
Containerized execution
-
Isolated environments
-
Hosted agent runtime
Use Zo if:
ElevenLabs
Voice interface.
ElevenLabs provides:
-
Text-to-speech
-
Speech-to-text
-
Voice agent capabilities
Use this if:
Jelly
AI-native social layer.
Jelly explores:
Useful if your project involves:
5. Suggested Build Paths
Option 1: Fastest Path
-
Use Convos Native Assistant
-
Deploy directly into a group chat
-
Iterate on prompt and behavior
Option 2: Custom Agent
Option 3: Full Stack
-
XMTP for messaging
-
Convos for interface
-
OpenClaw for execution
-
Convex for state
-
Zo for compute
-
ElevenLabs for voice
Choose the level of complexity that fits the time constraint.
6. What a Strong Submission Looks Like
-
Clear scoping of agents
-
Meaningful group coordination
-
Visible interaction inside the thread
-
A clean, understandable demo
Focus on clarity and coordination patterns.
Submissions are due at 6:00 PM with a YouTube demo link.